Which reasoning fallacy can be identified in prioritizing the need for a larger tax base based solely on hypothetical city expansions?

The reasoning fallacy identified in prioritizing the need for a larger tax base based solely on hypothetical city expansions is classified as wishful thinking. This fallacy occurs when conclusions are drawn based on a desire for a particular outcome rather than on sound reasoning or evidence.

In this context, focusing on the need for a larger tax base is predicated on speculative and optimistic scenarios of city growth that may not be grounded in reality. This approach reflects an optimistic view without sufficient evidence or analysis to support the assumption that such expansions will actually occur or that they will have the desired effects on the tax base. This reliance on hopeful scenarios rather than realistic assessments leads to flawed reasoning, as it ignores the complexities and uncertainties involved in urban planning and fiscal policy.