Which principle suggests that government intervention is detrimental to individual freedoms and the economy?

The principle that government intervention is detrimental to individual freedoms and the economy is best encapsulated by the concept of conservatism. Conservatism often emphasizes the importance of individual liberties, private property, and a free market economy. It posits that excessive government interference can impede personal freedoms and economic growth by constraining individual choices and reducing the efficiency of market mechanisms.

Supporters of this principle argue that when the government intervenes in markets, it can lead to inefficiencies, discourage entrepreneurship, and create a dependency on state welfare, ultimately hindering personal responsibility and economic dynamism. This framework is grounded in the belief that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests with minimal government restriction, allowing for a more vibrant and productive economic environment.

The other options presented do not adequately capture the essence of this view. Rationalization pertains to logical justifications that may not truly reflect reality, while causal oversimplification focuses on attributing a complex issue to a single cause without acknowledging the broader context. The "No Technique" choice implies a lack of a defined principle or strategy, which does not correspond to the idea of government intervention being inherently negative. Thus, conservatism is indeed the principle that aligns most closely with the notion that government action can adversely affect freedoms