Which logical strategy employs oversimplified binaries in political arguments?

The approach that utilizes oversimplified binaries in political arguments is best described as causal oversimplification. This strategy occurs when an issue is reduced to two opposing sides, ignoring the complexity of the situation. By framing arguments in such binary terms, it creates a false dichotomy which can mislead the audience by suggesting that only two extreme positions exist, thus neglecting a wide range of nuanced perspectives or middle-ground solutions. This tactic is often used in political discourse to polarize opinions and galvanize support by simplifying complex issues into "either/or" propositions, making it easier for audiences to align with one side or the other based on emotion rather than a detailed examination of the facts or multiple viewpoints.

In contrasts to other strategies, such as drawing the line, which involves delineating clear boundaries on contentious issues, causal oversimplification specifically highlights the tendency to reduce complex realities to simplistic choices. Similarly, wishful thinking and academic detachment do not focus on the oversimplification of political arguments but rather on the nature of beliefs or the stance of an observer towards a subject.