Which argument style does the basketball coach exemplify by sticking to a pre-established strategy despite evidence to change it?

The basketball coach's adherence to a pre-established strategy, even when presented with evidence that suggests a need for change, exemplifies conservatism. This style is characterized by a preference for maintaining traditional practices and approaches, often valuing consistency and stability over new or untested methods. In this context, the coach displays a belief in the reliability of established strategies and a resistance to adapting to new circumstances, which can be seen as an emphasis on preserving the status quo in the face of changing evidence.

In contrast, the other styles do not align with the coach's behavior. Radicalism would suggest a complete overhaul of strategies, while progressivism typically involves embracing change and innovation. Incrementalism would indicate a willingness to make gradual changes rather than sticking rigidly to a single strategy. Thus, the behavior of the coach embodies conservative principles by prioritizing the established method over potentially beneficial changes.