What type of reasoning does Jessica exemplify when arguing against sanctions on Iraq?

The type of reasoning exemplified by Jessica when arguing against sanctions on Iraq is causal oversimplification. This reasoning occurs when a complex issue or situation, such as the impact of sanctions on Iraq, is reduced to a simplistic cause-and-effect relationship, ignoring the multifaceted nature of the issue.

In the context of arguing against sanctions, this might involve suggesting that the sanctions will only produce one straightforward outcome, such as increasing suffering among civilians, without considering other potential consequences or the nuanced political and humanitarian dimensions involved. This oversimplification can lead to a failure to recognize the broader implications and interconnections that are essential for a well-rounded understanding of the situation.

By focusing predominantly on one aspect, Jessica's argument may lack depth and fail to fully address the reasons behind the sanctions or their diverse effects, which characterizes this specific form of reasoning.