What type of argument is exemplified by promising city improvements without addressing current issues?

The scenario described exemplifies causal oversimplification because it implies a direct connection between promised city improvements and the resolution of existing problems without acknowledging the complexities and nuances of those current issues. This type of argument tends to present solutions that oversimplify the relationships between causes and effects, falsely suggesting that implementing new initiatives will automatically resolve existing challenges. In political or civic contexts, this argument can be particularly persuasive as it offers a hopeful vision of the future while sidestepping the critical examination of the current state of affairs. This can mislead audiences by creating the illusion of progress while ignoring the underlying problems that need to be addressed for any real improvement to occur.