What reasoning did the officer in charge use to dismiss the radar indication of hostile planes?

The reasoning used to dismiss the radar indication of hostile planes is best understood through the concept of wishful thinking. This cognitive bias occurs when individuals favor outcomes that align with their desires or hopes over objective reality. In the context of the officer's decision, it suggests that personal or collective hopes influenced the judgment to disregard the radar readings. The desire for safety and the belief that no threat was present may have led to a conclusion that contradicted the evidence presented by the radar. This reflects how emotions and desires can sometimes cloud rational decision-making, demonstrating wishful thinking's potential impact in critical situations.

On the other hand, conservatism typically refers to a preference for established methods or beliefs, while rationalization involves creating excuses to justify a decision or viewpoint. Inconceivability pertains to something being too improbable to accept, which does not directly apply to interpreting radar evidence. Thus, the most fitting explanation for the officer's dismissal of the radar indication is rooted in wishful thinking, as it highlights the influence of personal beliefs and desires on decision-making.