What is exemplified when someone argues they can't do their homework because it would affect their extracurriculars?

The correct choice highlights rationalization, which occurs when an individual provides a seemingly reasonable explanation for a decision or action that may not be justifiable. In this context, the student argues that completing their homework would interfere with their extracurricular activities as a way to justify not doing the homework. The argument suggests that because of the perceived conflict between responsibilities, it is acceptable to prioritize extracurriculars over academic obligations.

Rationalization often involves framing a choice in a way that minimizes feelings of guilt or anxiety about the decision. The student may feel overwhelmed by the demands of both homework and extracurricular activities and therefore justifies not completing the homework by emphasizing the importance of their extracurriculars. This can serve to alleviate cognitive dissonance—the mental discomfort experienced when faced with conflicting values or options.

By identifying the reasoning as rationalization, it becomes clear that the student is not genuinely addressing their responsibilities but rather creating a defense for neglecting their academic duties. This highlights the importance of understanding and managing priorities effectively rather than using rationalization to excuse behavior that may hinder academic success.