What does the argument suggest about the classification of full-time versus part-time students?

The argument suggesting "Not Drawing the Line" emphasizes the fluid or ambiguous nature of classifying students strictly as full-time or part-time. This perspective recognizes that the distinctions between full-time and part-time students may not adequately reflect the varying degrees of commitment, engagement, or circumstances that students face.

By embracing a mindset of not strictly categorizing students, the argument acknowledges the diversity within the student body and the myriad of experiences that contribute to a student's educational journey. It reflects an understanding that rigid classifications can overlook important factors such as varying enrollment patterns, attendance styles, and the types of courses taken, which can significantly impact one's educational experience.

This approach invites a broader, more inclusive discussion about student status and recognizes that learning can occur in many forms beyond traditional definitions, ultimately advocating for a more nuanced understanding of student classification.