What do proponents argue is the main reason to fight against Russia?

The argument that proponents emphasize about fighting against Russia primarily revolves around the protection of personal liberties. This perspective is grounded in the belief that authoritarian regimes, like that of Russia, threaten democratic values and human rights not only within their own borders but also in adjacent nations and regions. Proponents contend that if left unchecked, such regimes can embolden other oppressive governments and erode individual freedoms globally.

By standing firm against Russia’s actions, supporters claim they are defending the fundamental rights of people to live freely, express themselves without fear, and participate in a democratic process. This rationale is tied to a broader ideological commitment to uphold the principles of freedom and democracy, arguing that an attack on liberties in one area can lead to declines elsewhere. Their stance suggests that by confronting threats from authoritarian powers, societies can work to safeguard and promote personal freedoms for all.

The other options, while valid in their contexts, do not capture the driving ideological motivation many proponents highlight in discussions about confronting Russia.