What conclusion can be drawn when someone refuses to change their established approach despite new information?

The conclusion drawn from someone refusing to change their established approach despite new information can be interpreted as conservatism. This refers to a tendency to prefer traditional methods and resist new ideas or changes due to a belief that existing practices are more stable or reliable. Individuals exhibiting conservatism may value their established beliefs and practices, leading them to dismiss new information that contradicts their views.

While stubbornness might imply an obstinate refusal to change, conservatism is more appropriately about holding onto established practices out of caution or a preference for the status quo. Fear of change suggests an emotional response that can intertwine with conservatism but doesn't encapsulate the broader reasoning that can stem from a preference for tradition. Resistance can describe an action taken against change but doesn't necessarily imply a foundational belief or value system, which is what conservatism emphasizes. Thus, conservatism better encompasses the notion of grounding in established norms while maintaining a reluctance to embrace new ideas.