What argument is represented by saying students will improve by switching from phonics to a whole language approach?

The argument that students will improve by switching from phonics to a whole language approach is characterized by wishful thinking. This term captures the idea that the proposed solution is based more on an optimistic belief that simply changing teaching methods will yield positive results, rather than on concrete evidence or logical reasoning.

In this context, advocating for a switch to a whole language approach implies a hopeful expectation that it alone will automatically lead to improved reading skills among students. Wishful thinking overlooks the complexities of learning processes and the variety of factors that affect student achievement. It suggests an oversimplification of educational challenges, as it assumes that changing the method of instruction is the sole or primary solution to issues related to literacy and learning, without addressing other necessary elements, such as student engagement, teacher training, and individual learning needs.

This focus on a singular, favored approach rather than a comprehensive strategy illustrates a belief that merely adopting the whole language methodology will suffice to enhance students' reading abilities, exemplifying the essence of wishful thinking in educational reform discussions.