How would one categorize Milo's dismissive view of the National Academic Games Tournament?

Milo's dismissive view of the National Academic Games Tournament can be categorized as Tabloid Thinking, which often refers to oversimplified opinions or judgments that lack nuance and critical depth. In this context, it implies that Milo is approaching the tournament with a superficial judgment, possibly dismissing its importance or relevance based on limited understanding or exposure. This kind of thinking is akin to how tabloids present information: they often reduce complex issues to sensationalized, easily digestible bites that lack thorough analysis or substance.

Tabloid Thinking contrasts with more analytical approaches where one would consider various perspectives, facts, and implications. This reasoning helps clarify Milo’s attitude, highlighting a lack of engagement with the tournament’s significance and a preference for a simplistic viewpoint, rather than discussing the merits or intricacies involved in competing in such an event.