A refusal to consider non-local opinions or performances can exhibit what type of intellectual bias?

The recognition that a refusal to consider non-local opinions or performances demonstrates prejudice aligns with the understanding of how bias affects judgment and perspective. Prejudice involves forming opinions or evaluations based on preconceived notions rather than objective analysis. In this context, it indicates a bias where one dismisses valuable insights and contributions from outside one’s own local or familiar context.

Such an outlook narrows one's intellectual horizon and limits understanding, as it reflects a preference for familiar ideas over potentially enriching or diverse perspectives. This not only stifles a more comprehensive view of situations but also perpetuates stereotypes and hinders collaboration and learning from a broader range of experiences.

Other options do not fit as precisely because causal oversimplification refers to attributing complex issues to single factors; wishful thinking involves believing something simply because one wishes it to be true; and "no technique" lacks the context of a recognized intellectual bias. Thus, the refusal to engage with broader opinions manifesting as prejudice highlights a specific and detrimental intellectual limitation.